{"id":56627,"date":"2018-03-16T11:50:30","date_gmt":"2018-03-16T06:50:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tns.world\/?p=56627"},"modified":"2018-03-16T11:50:30","modified_gmt":"2018-03-16T06:50:30","slug":"with-rohingya-gone-myanmars-ethnic-rakhine-seek-muslim-free-buffer-zone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tns.world\/?p=56627","title":{"rendered":"With Rohingya gone, Myanmar&#8217;s ethnic Rakhine seek Muslim-free &#8216;buffer zone&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Koe Tan Kauk, Myanmar March 12 (TNS): <\/strong>Buddhist flags hang limply from bamboo poles at the entrance to Koe Tan Kauk, a &#8220;model&#8221; village for ethnic Rakhine migrants shuttled north to repopulate an area once dominated by Rohingya Muslims.<\/p>\n<p>The new arrivals are moving to parts of Rakhine state mostly &#8220;cleared&#8221; of its Rohingya residents, whose villages were bulldozed and reduced to muddy stains on a landscape of lush farmland.<\/p>\n<p>The Rakhine migrants, who come from the poor but relatively stable south, are &#8212; for now &#8212; few in number.<\/p>\n<p>But they carry great expectations as the pioneers of a donor-led &#8220;Rakhinisation&#8221; plan to upend the demography of the once majority-Muslim area.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We were really afraid of those Kalars and didn&#8217;t plan to come here,&#8221; Chit San Eain, a 28-year-old who has moved with her husband and toddler into a basic hut in Koe Tan Kauk tells AFP, using a pejorative term for Muslims.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But now that they are no longer here, we have the chance to meet again with our relatives who live up here,&#8221; she added, the ruins of a Rohingya settlement lying a few kilometres away.<\/p>\n<p>Nearly 700,000 Rohingya have been driven from northern Rakhine into Bangladesh since August 25 last year by a Myanmar army offensive against Muslim militants.<\/p>\n<p>Another 300,000 Rohingya were pushed out from the south and centre of Rakhine by army campaigns stretching back to the late 1970s.<\/p>\n<p>The UN has branded last year&#8217;s military crackdown ethnic cleansing, with a top official saying it carried all the &#8220;hallmarks of genocide.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Myanmar vigorously denies the allegations and says refugees are welcome to return.<\/p>\n<p>But so far it has agreed to allow back only 374 of 8,000 refugees whose names have been put forward for the initial phase of repatriation.<\/p>\n<p>Many traumatised Rohingya in Cox&#8217;s Bazar camps are also refusing to be repatriated to Rakhine &#8212; where holding camps and hostile neighbours await them.<\/p>\n<p>In their absence a blizzard of development projects, government and army-sponsored or privately funded, are transforming northern Rakhine.<\/p>\n<p>Taking space vacated by fleeing Rohingya is an old game in a state seen as the frontline of a Buddhist nation&#8217;s fight against encroaching Islam.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The military has been engineering the social landscape of northern Rakhine State so as to dilute the Rohingya population since the early 1990s,&#8221; says Francis Wade, author of &#8220;Myanmar&#8217;s Enemy Within: Buddhist Violence and the Making of the Muslim &#8216;Other'&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The Muslim minority are denied citizenship and labelled &#8220;Bengalis&#8221;, outsiders who &#8212; the logic runs &#8212; have successfully been pushed back to their country of origin.<\/p>\n<p>In a pattern with echoes of &#8220;the Israeli settler project in the West Bank&#8221; Buddhist communities then move in, altering the &#8220;facts on the ground&#8221; gradually rubbing out Muslim rights to the land, he added.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d expect to see more Buddhists settle there over the coming years. And then we&#8217;ll forget what the area once was, and that process of erasure will be complete.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Rohingya out, Rakhine in &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Chit San Ean is the beneficiary of the Ancillary Committee for the Reconstruction of Rakhine National Territory in the Western Frontier (CRR), a private scheme established shortly after the refugee crisis began.<\/p>\n<p>In a zone under a strict army lockdown the resettlement plan could not fly without military consent.<\/p>\n<p>Funded by ethnic Rakhine donors, the CRR&#8217;s ambition is to establish a &#8220;Muslim-dry&#8221; buffer zone running the nearly 100 kilometres from state capital Sittwe to Maungdaw town, according to Oo Hla Saw, a Rakhine MP who advises the committee.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All of this area was under the influence of Muslims. After the military operations, they had to flee&#8230; so we have to establish this area with the Rakhine population,&#8221; he told AFP.<\/p>\n<p>The CRR will fund jobs and homes &#8220;so this little population can grow and grow,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a trickle so far, with around 64 households &#8212; some 250 people &#8212; moved by the CRR, with 200 more families on a waiting list.<\/p>\n<p>They are among the poorest of the poor, mostly daily wage labourers from Thandwe around 600 kilometres to the south or squatters from Sittwe.<\/p>\n<p>Two village tracts, Koe Tan Kuak near Rathedaung and Inn Din near Maungdaw, have been designated for the scheme so far.<\/p>\n<p>The army concedes the second site was the scene of extrajudicial killings of Rohingya captives as violence engulfed the region last August.<\/p>\n<p>Koe Tan Kauk was a similarly mixed settlement of Buddhist and Muslim homes.<\/p>\n<p>The CRR-sponsored hamlet promises a rudimentary existence.<\/p>\n<p>There is little work, no electricity or running water but donors have gifted each family a $450 shack on stilts, made from plywood and metal sheeting.<\/p>\n<p>New residents hope to eventually own land, a prospect previously beyond their reach in Myanmar&#8217;s second-poorest state.<\/p>\n<p>Rakhine nationalists say the CRR is a bulwark against Islam and a means to ensure their ethnic group has a say in development projects driven by the Burmese-dominated central state, who they distrust deeply.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Who should be given priority other than Rakhines in Rakhine State?&#8221; explained Than Tun, General Secretary of the CRR.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Cronies and soldiers &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>For its part, Myanmar&#8217;s government has enlisted powerful businessmen to rebuild the infrastructure of the battered state.<\/p>\n<p>The army is running other projects including beefing up its security apparatus &#8212; in what appears to be a multi-pronged effort to keep out the Rohingya.<\/p>\n<p>An Amnesty International report this week detailed how roads, helipads and security installations are being built, often on top of razed Rohingya settlements.<\/p>\n<p>They labelled the activity a massive &#8220;land grab&#8221; that threatens to erase evidence of alleged atrocities, including at Inn Din.<\/p>\n<p>Across northern Rakhine, abandoned land and rice fields have been commandeered by the army in an area with access tightly controlled to media, investigators and most aid groups.<\/p>\n<p>The Rohingya lost their legal status in 1982, under a junta-era Citizenship Law. Now their ancestral lands are being stripped away.<\/p>\n<p>That makes return impossible, according to lawmaker Oo Hla Saw.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These people want to be recognised as &#8216;Rohingya&#8217; ethnicity&#8230; to enjoy citizenship, to resettle in their native grounds,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Their demands are unreasonable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Despite their dangerous new neighbourhood, the arrivals at Koe Tan Kauk say they are there to stay.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I will end my life here,&#8221; said a 69-year-old woman called Osar. &#8220;I&#8217;m not going anywhere.\u201d\u00a0 TNS\/AFP<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Koe Tan Kauk, Myanmar March 12 (TNS): Buddhist flags hang limply from bamboo poles at the entrance to Koe Tan Kauk, a &#8220;model&#8221; village for ethnic Rakhine migrants shuttled north to repopulate an area once dominated by Rohingya Muslims. The new arrivals are moving to parts of Rakhine state mostly &#8220;cleared&#8221; of its Rohingya residents, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":56628,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56627","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56627","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=56627"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56627\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56629,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56627\/revisions\/56629"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/56628"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=56627"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=56627"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tns.world\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=56627"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}