ISLAMABAD, Nov. 7 (TNS): Supreme Court in its detailed judgment said on Tuesday that former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif tried to fool masses in and outside parliament.
“He [Nawaz] even tried to fool the court without realising that you can fool all the people for some of the time, some of the people all the time but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time,” said the 23-page verdict of the Supreme Court on the review petition filed earlier by Sharif.
The judges dismissed the notion that there wasn’t any link between the respondent No. 10 captain (retd) Safdar and Avenfield apartments, saying that respondent No. 6 Marium Safdar prima facie happens to be the beneficial owner of the property.
buy lasix online https://rxxbuynoprescriptiononline.com/dir/lasix.html no prescription
The court ruled that the evidence relating to Sharif’s disqualification was undisputed.
buy avanafil online https://rxxbuynoprescriptiononline.com/dir/avanafil.html no prescription
Further, the verdict does not point to any legal loophole. The accountability court, it continued, can scrutinise the available evidence in the case at length.
“Petitioner (Nawaz Sharif) entitlement to salary stems from a written employment contract. Salary in this case, it may be noted, is not
salary of the future which was yet to accrue.”
It was salary of the past six and a half years which had already accrued and accumulated. There is nothing in oral or written form, from July 2006 to January 2013 as could stop the accrual and accumulation of salary or prevent it from becoming an asset.
There is also nothing in oral or written form in between July 2006 to January 2013 as could stop the withdrawal of the salary thus accrued and accumulated.
Therefore, the argument that the salary even if agreed upon under the employment contract, would not be an asset if not withdrawn is not correct.
Refuge in evasive, equivocal and non-committal reply does not help always. If fortune has throned, crowned and sceptered him to rule the country, his conduct should be above board and impeccable.”
Whatever he does or says must be res ipsa loquitur (thing speaks
for itself).
Resignation rather than prevarication in ambiguous terms is more honourable exit if and when anything secretly carried under the sanctimonious gown of leadership drops and gets sighted.
Since the Prime Minister of the country is thought to be the ethos personified of the nation he represents at national and international level, denying an asset established or defending a trust deed written in 2006 in a font becoming commercial in 2007 is below his
dignity and decorum of the office he holds.
